Headlines

Search This Blog

Loading...

Microsoft office 2007 Review







Office is like the weather—you can't get away from it—but the 2007 version combines power, ease of use, and visual clarity in ways that leave earlier versions far behind.


New interface give beginners the same power as experts. Dazzling new graphics engine. Massively improved security. Smoother collaboration.


Not all applications get an interface overhaul. New interface can't be customized—yet. Potential for document-sharing problems with users of versions before Office 2003.

Microsoft Office 2007 packs more improvements into the world's leading application suite than any previous upgrade. For most users, the big question isn't whether to upgrade but when. Experts, beginners, and corporate users all get major benefits from the upgrade. The only downsides I could find are minor ones that will probably disappear in the first service pack. Once you get past the few minutes needed to navigate the new Ribbon interface, you'll wonder why Microsoft waited so long to get so many things right. The code has been released only to manufacturers. Enterprise customers should be able to download the software by November 30, and boxes should hit the shelves early next year.




The Ribbon interface gives quick access to dozens of features that used to be hidden behind labyrinthine menus, and it also displays even quicker keyboard shortcuts. Microsoft Outlook finally gets built-in indexing and RSS feeds. The SmartArt graphics engine makes dazzling organization charts, pyramid charts, and other visuals for displaying verbal data. Corporate users get access to server-based slide libraries, collaborative workspaces for storing and sharing documents, and improved document-security and document-comparison features.

A new, fully documented XML-based document format gets our vote for doing away with openings to macro viruses. Our hats go off to Microsoft also for eliminating the usual headaches of sharing files among versions. And good news for those who're making the change but have to work with others who aren't: When a user of an Office 2003 setup (with all recent updates) double-clicks on an Office 2007 file for the first time, a prompt offers to download a converter package that lets the 2003 version open and save files in the new format. It's a large download (about 27MB) but a vital one, and the filters work as expected.

The new interface doesn't force you to rethink the underlying logic of your work, because Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Publisher, Access, Project, InfoPath, Visio, and OneNote all work basically as they did before—only more easily. Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook are the only programs to get the full interface upgrade. Actually, Outlook gets the new interface upgrade only in its content-creation screens.

The new suite feels right from the start. I tested some massively complex Word and Excel files from earlier versions, and they opened quickly and without formatting or other hiccups. When you click in different parts of a document such a table or chart, the interface responds instantly with options that you need, and a right-click brings up a menu of the formatting and other options that you almost certainly wanted. The new slider bar for zooming in and out appears in the lower window border and becomes addictive the first time you use it.

Different versions of Office 2007 come with different application sets, ranging from a Basic version limited to Word, Excel, and Outlook, to an Enterprise version with everything. A new addition is the easily managed collaborative workspace software Groove 2007, which lets groups of users create menus of shared documents and messages. OneNote also gets shared access to the unstructured information formerly available only to single users. FrontPage is history, replaced in high-end Office packages by SharePoint Designer, a site editor for corporate-scale SharePoint collaboration services. We won't miss FrontPage because a sleek, up-to-date standalone Web site editor—Microsoft's Expression Web—is now in late beta.

Thanks to the new interface, features such as fonts and page margins are blissfully easy to manage through galleries of prebuilt settings. Similar galleries give instant access to new features such as spreadsheet cells that automatically display chart-style color bars. If you're starved for editing space, Ctrl-F1 hides the ribbon entirely. Word also gets a real-time word count—something editors and writers have wanted for years. The ribbon still has some annoying wrinkles, such as the bafflingly illogical placement of macros on Word's View menu. Unlike the menu-modifying features in Office 2003, the new version doesn't offer any built-in and easy way to modify the XML file that defines the Ribbon, although you can expect third-party and Microsoft tools to arrive soon.

Outlook's new To-Do Bar gives a one-glance list of pending tasks, and Outlook can now send text messages to phones and PDAs via four cooperating mobile services (expect more to sign up later). Outlook also lets you access and modify shared calendars, contacts, and tasks stored on a SharePoint server. Word includes a convenient building-blocks feature for reusing items such as boilerplate text and cover pages, plus a simple interface for posting to blogs. Excel's charting adds subtle colors, and pivot tables are easier than ever. An Excel spreadsheet can be posted in HTML format on a SharePoint server and dynamically modified in a Web browser. PowerPoint can include slides stored on a server, and the slides in your presentation can be updated to match the version on the server.

After strolling up the easy learning curve for the new interface, I found Office 2007 smoother and clearer than any earlier version, with surprisingly few wrinkles still waiting to be smoothed out—for example, the different ways in which applications support server-based libraries of reusable material, and the lack of customization tools for the interface. Office 2007 is Microsoft's finest hour in a very long time. I hope the upgrade from Windows XP to Vista can be as smooth as the upgrade from Office 2003 to 2007.

Insignia Sport MP3 Player (2GB)


The good: The Insignia Sport is very easy to use and provides good overall sound quality for the price. The rechargeable battery is easy to remove.

The bad: The buttons on the front of the Insignia Sport are too close to each other. The player lacks features like voice/FM recording and on-the-fly playlists, and photos look pretty bad.

The bottom line: The Insignia Sport is an inexpensive MP3 player that's suitable for casual listening, but fitness buffs looking for a gym companion should be aware that the buttons can be a bit annoying to use while exercising.

Logitech G15 gaming keyboard


The $79.99 Logitech G15 gaming keyboard is a massive, feature-rich input device aimed at the dedicated gamer. Its size is due largely to 18 extra programmable buttons, which come in handy mostly for massively multiplayer online games. All of the keys are backlit with a handsome blue LED for gaming in the dark. The flip-up LED screen is a nice touch, but we wish Logitech had shipped the keyboard with the functionality to interact with games. Instead, Logitech includes a development kit in hopes developers and gamers themselves will write apps to make games better interact with the keyboard and, for example, show stats on the screen.

Logitech G7 laser cordless mouse


Most gamers avoid cordless mice with good reason: battery life can be short-lived, and you run the risk of lag. Logitech addresses both concerns with the optical G7 laser cordless mouse, which features programmable buttons, adjustable sensitivity levels, and a quick-swappable battery. At $99, it's a good cordless option for the gaming set, but those who don't mind being chained to their computers should consider the Logitech G5 laser mouse, which offers the same level of programmability for $30 less.

Microsoft Laser Mouse 6000

In the gaming mice category, the Microsoft Laser Mouse 6000 is up against some stiff competition from trendsetters such as the Logitech G5 and the Razer Copperhead. From the start, the Laser Mouse 6000's 800dpi resolution doesn't hold up to the 2,000dpi offered by the other manufacturers. For its $54.95 price, we expected at least a solid, comfortable mouse with convenient, programmable buttons. Instead, the body feels flimsy, and the buttons are awkwardly placed, making it uncomfortable for general mousing and high-performance gaming alike. Despite its shortcomings, the Laser Mouse 6000 is ambidextrous and boasts programmable thumb buttons on both sides; you can customize one of the buttons to toggle between two different sensor-resolution settings, and you can also program a button to launch a macro of key commands.

Razer Copperhead


With the most sensitive laser sensor available and powerful configuration software, we expected the Razer Copperhead to strike a fatal blow to Logitech's leading G5 laser mouse. Though a strong performer, the Copperhead lacks some key features. Where the G5 has easy-access buttons on the scrollwheel for switching resolution on the fly, you need to flip the Copperhead over entirely to switch its sensitivity. Worse, the Copperhead needed both software and firmware upgrades to get Windows to recognize it reliably on our tests. Also, the optional weight kit will add $30 to the Copperhead's $79.99 price and using it voids the warranty.

Review of K800i

Sony Ericsson K800i
The K800i has a simple yet attractive design.
Sony Ericsson K800i
Is it a camera? No, it's a phone.

Almost identical to the K790a in terms of design and features, the K800i also adds the needed support for global roaming and 3G UMTS networks. The K800i is designed for the European and Asian markets, so it won't be with a U.S. carrier. Though you can still buy it here, it will cost in the $500 range.
Like the K790a, the K800i sports a simple candy bar form factor that's roughly rectangular in shape but still sleek and stylish. What's more, the black-and-gray color scheme accurately reflects the high-tech features inside. It's far from compact (4.1 by 1.9 by 0.9 inches; 4.1 ounces) but with its solid construction and comfortable feeling in the hands, it's a worthy trade-off.

The K800i has the K790a's same brilliant 262,144-color display that measures two inches diagonally (240x320 pixels). Below the display is the navigation array, which is similar as well. The five-way joystick doubles as a shortcut to four user-defined functions, while the two soft keys open the recent-calls list and the main menu when the phone is in standby mode. There are also dedicated Back and Clear buttons, a key that launches the Web browser, and a nifty control that opens a submenu of user-defined shortcuts and a list of upcoming calendar events. Overall the navigation controls were tactile and easy to use, but they are somewhat squashed together. The backlit keypad buttons were a nice change, however, from previous Sony Ericssons. Rectangular in shape, they are large enough for most hands and are raised just above the surface.
A music player button and the Memory Stick Micro slot sit on the left spine, while the right spine holds a volume rocker and a camera shutter control. The camera lens and self-portrait mirror sit on the back of the handset behind a sliding cover. Above is the large, high-quality flash, while a small speaker is next to the camera lens.

The phone book holds a respectable 1,000 contacts with room in each entry for five phone numbers, Web and e-mail addresses, a work title and company name, work and home street addresses, a birth date, and notes (the SIM card holds an additional 250 names). You can organize contacts into groups and pair them with photos for caller ID. You can pair contacts with one of 16 72-chord polyphonic and MP3 tones. Other essential offerings include a vibrate mode, text and multimedia messaging, an alarm clock, a calendar, a task list, a timer, a stopwatch, a calculator, a notepad, and a voice memo recorder (space is limited by the available memory).

The K7800i also comes with a wealth of business-friendly features. You'll find full Bluetooth for connecting to a wireless headset or sending files or your electronics business card to another Bluetooth device. And like with many other Sony Ericssons, you can use the phone as a modem and use the Bluetooth feature as a remote control to connect with other Bluetooth devices. Other high-end goodies include a speakerphone, an RSS news reader, an infrared port, PC syncing for contacts and other files, USB cable support, e-mail, voice dialing, and a code memo for storing passwords and other secure information. And because the phone supports UMTS networks, you can watch streaming video.

Like the K790a, the 3.2-megapixel K800i Cyber Shot is one of the most advanced camera phones we've reviewed. Camera features were the same on both phones. You can take pictures in four resolutions, from VGA up to the full 3 meagpixels, and choose from two image quality choices. Other notable offerings include a panorama mode, red-eye reduction, spot metering, a macro setting, and image stabilization (see the K790a review for a full list of the camera features). The camcorder, which is also similar, takes MPEG-4 clips with sound in one resolution (176x144). And here again the remarkable Xenon flooded our photos and videos with light even in dim situations.

The K800i had the K790's same outstanding picture quality with bright colors, distinct object outlines, and sharp effects. The flash can be too strong at times, so use it at your discretion. Video quality was satisfactory overall, but it was also a bit grainy, and quick movements were blurry. Clips meant for multimedia messages are capped at two minutes; otherwise length is limited by the available memory. When you're finished with your photos, you can save them to the phone's 64MB of shared internal memory (we suggest getting a Memory Stick for more storage). You can also send your snaps wirelessly via Bluetooth, e-mail, or a multimedia message; upload them quickly to an online blog; or transfer them to a computer via a USB cable. For creative types, the phone has photo- and video-editing applications including a fun FaceWarp application for playing with your favorite headshots.

Sony Ericsson K800i
We loved the K800i's picture quality.

The K800i's music player lets you organize music by artist, track name, or playlist and choose from settings that include album/song shuffle and loop, stereo widening, and an equalizer. Music stops automatically when you get a call, you can minimize the player's interface, and an airplane mode lets you listen to your tunes in flight with the cell phone turned off. There are stereo speakers on the back and the phone supports a Bluetooth profile. Music capacity is limited by the available memory, so again buying a Memory Stick Micro is a good idea. To get music on the phone, you can use an included USB cable or send tunes via Bluetooth or the infrared port. You also get the Sony Ericsson FM radio with 20 presets, though you must use it with a headset, which acts as an antenna.

You can personalize the K800i with a variety of themes, wallpaper, and screensavers. As always, you can purchase more options and ring tones from Sony Ericsson via the WAP 2.0 wireless Web browser. Alternatively, the phone comes with a Music DJ application for composing your own ring tones. Gamers can enjoy three Java (J2ME) titles: FotoQuest Fishing, Mini Golf: Castle, and Tennis Multiplay, with additional titles available for purchase. Like with the Sony Ericsson W600i, some games are played in landscape mode while using the special gameplay keys above the display.

We tested the triband (GSM 900/1800/1900; UMTS 2100) Sony Ericsson K800i world phone in San Francisco using Cingular service. Call quality was comparable to that of the K790a, which is to say it was very good with nice clarity, little static, and no interference from other electronic devices. Likewise, volume could be a bit louder on our end, but it should be quite serviceable for most users. Calls faded out a bit in buildings, but that's to be expected since the phone isn't operating on the GSM 850 band. On their end, callers had similar experiences. They could tell we were using a cell phone, but they had few problems hearing or understanding us. Speakerphone quality was good as well. Just take note that on the K800i, the main speaker faces the back of the phone as well.

The K800i has a rated talk time of seven hours and a promised standby time of 14.5 days. We managed to get an impressive six hours and 45 minutes of talk time in our tests. According to FCC radiation tests the K800i has a digital SAR rating of 0.58 watts per kilogram.

Sony Ericsson K800i Cyber-shot

The good: The Sony Ericsson K800i offers solid features, superior photo quality, and excellent performance in a sharp, eye-catching package.

The bad: The Sony Ericsson K800i's call volume was a tad low, and the navigation controls were squashed together. Also, menu navigation was somewhat sluggish.

The bottom line: With an amazing selection of features and great performance, the Sony Ericsson K7800i joins the company's K790a as a superior camera phone.

Battery Life of standard Nokia Phones

Nokia

Phone model Talk-time battery life
(in hours)
Nokia 2115i Shorty 4.5
Nokia 3155i 4.5
Nokia 3200 7
Nokia 3205 3
Nokia 3220 4.5
Nokia 3300 5
Nokia 3620 7
Nokia 5140 6
Nokia 5300 3
Nokia 6061i 4
Nokia 6030 15
Nokia 6061 4
Nokia 6101 7.5
Nokia 6102 7.5
Nokia 6126 3.75
Nokia 6200 4.75
Nokia 6215i 4
Nokia 6225 3
Nokia 6230 6
Nokia 6236i 5
Nokia 6255i 3.75
Nokia 6305i 5.2
Nokia 6315i 4
Nokia 6600 2.75
Nokia 6610 5
Nokia 6682 4
Nokia 6820 5
Nokia 7270 5.5
Nokia 7280 4.25
Nokia 7370 3.75
Nokia 7380 2
Nokia 7610 6
Nokia 8800 4
Nokia 9300 5.25
Nokia E61 8
Nokia E62 8
Nokia N80 5
Nokia N73 9.5
Nokia N91 5.5
Nokia N93 6.1

LG enV (VX9900)


The good: The LG enV offers an impressive feature set, an easy-to-use QWERTY keyboard, and decent call quality.

The bad: The enV's streaming video quality could be better, and the boxy design has its quirks. Also, its external display is small and not very useful.

The bottom line: The design still isn't perfect, but the LG enV is a high-quality messaging and multimedia cell phone.

Sony MDR-EX90LP


The good: The Sony MDR-EX90LP provides excellent clarity and detail and decent bass response; the understated black-and-silver design meshes well with most gadgets.

The bad: The silicone ear fittings included with the Sony MDR-EX90LP don't always create a seal with the ear; no cable extender for at-home listening.

The bottom line: The Sony MDR-EX90LP earbuds sound as good as their $100 price tag suggests, but there's nothing particularly exciting about them. They're just good headphones with an understated design.

Sony NW-S705F (2GB)


Sony is beginning to stamp its authority on flash-based MP3 players with this very classy offering. Along with design, what makes this unit so special is its built-in noise-cancelling technology. The design of the hardware and user interface are hard to fault, save for the inability to rotate the display to your comfort. The Walkman is extremely customisable, boasting lots of features and a superb battery life.

Design
Sony's new Walkman effort is sheer elegance. The unit's shiny and reflective veneer is well complemented by a classy user interface fronted by a colour OLED display which unfortunately, is faint under sunlight.

Despite the cramped dimensions, the three-line display is very well-utilised for toggling between tracks and albums and includes some space for album art. Users can turn the rotating dial to navigate the menu and swap between track and album view by sliding the dial along a horizontal axis.

At 87.2 x 27.4 x 16.8mm with a sturdy 47g frame, the Walkman is fairly petite but pretty heavy when compared with MP3 players of the same build. For a good comparison, the older NW-E005 at 25g is almost half the weight of the NW-S705F. The buttons are well-laid-out except for the inaccessible Play Mode/Sound button on the rear.

The 13.5mm diameter earbuds share some of the design aesthetics of the higher-end Sony MDR-EX90LP. What's different is that microphones are built into the earphones to monitor ambient noise. Sony has possibly scored a first by building noise-cancelling technology into the MP3 player.

Previously, noise-cancelling solutions were the domain of headphone manufacturers, with resulting bulky processor units integrated inside the headphones. By hiding the processors within the MP3 player itself, it's definitely more elegant and unobtrusive.

Features
The unique selling point of the NW-S705F is its noise-cancelling ability. In tests conducted in public transport environments, low-end noise like train rumbles were noticeably muted, though typical of consumer noise-cancelling technology, mid- to higher-end noise still comes through. Sony compensates for this by letting the user take control of the microphone's sensitivity. This helps to create a more tailored noise cancelling for different sonic environments. At press time, it's the first consumer grade product we have come across to have such an option.

The NW-S705F's noise-cancelling technology works by using the embedded microphones on the earbuds to monitor ambient noise level and send an inverse sound signal to cancel it.

Most of the player features are accessed via holding the Home button on the side of the MP3 player. This opens up options such as FM radio, playlists, shuffle playback, search, noise-cancelling activation and record arranged on a horizontal axis.

Shuffle playback is apparently a strong suit for the NW-S705F. The Time Machine shuffle picks and plays songs published in a random year and the Artist Link shuffle connects songs based on data from Gracenote's CDDB. Do note that songs have to be Artist Link-tagged in SonicStage before the option appears in the NW-S705F.

Carrying on the athletic theme from the NW-S200 series, the Sports Shuffle sets a specified playback time limit adjustable in 1-minute increments of up to 99 minutes. Unfortunately for runners, songs can be drawn only from the main library and not from a preset playlist.

Interestingly enough, the player does not need to go through a PC to transfer music onboard. An optional 3.5mm analog jack allows for recording from other devices like MD players/laptops directly to the player. The sound source output level can be adjusted via a switch on the jack (two levels). Recoding can be set to be sound-activated.

There is support for ATRAC, MP3, AAC, WMA and Linear-PCM formats. SonicStage CP is included for content management, though we'd like to gripe yet again that we would have preferred to be given the option to drag-and-drop songs directly via Windows Explorer.

Performance
The NW-S705F produced resonant bass, but the mids and highs were not crisp though they were adequate. When noise-canceling was activated, audio quality was not compromised. In fact, it was barely distinguishable from the normal mode.

When recording audio through the 3.5mm analog jack, we were satisfied with the overall quality. However, we did experience some teething problems initially when the left channel was barely audible. But subsequent recordings ran without problem.

The transfer rate through SonicStage was fairly consistent at 1.08MB to 1.19MB per second. However, the speed was rather slow when compared with other flash memory MP3 players.

FM autoscan results at our test location in the heart of the Central Business District were outstanding. The NW-S705F scored every station within the local FM spectrum.

Audio tweakers would be pleased. Instead of one user-defined five-band equaliser, the NW-S705F comes with two as well as four selectable virtual soundstages. Sony also touts a Clear Stereo technology that "enables individual left and right digital processing of the sound" from which we didn't hear much of a difference.

Sony claims a rated battery life of 47 hours which is a fairly impressive figure that should last an entire plane trip to London or LA.

iRiver S10 (2GB)

The good:

  • Brilliant design
  • D-Click navigation
  • Good transfer speed

The bad:

  • Poor battery life
  • Lacklustre FM auto scan

The bottomline:

The iRiver S10 may have its shortfalls, but it's all at the expense of size. At least, from the standpoint of a mini MP3 player, it's probably the best that money can buy.

Internet Explorer 7 vs. Firefox 2


For years, Microsoft Internet Explorer has enjoyed near dominance of the Web browser space -- but not any more. Since the release last year of Mozilla Firefox 1.5, Firefox has been steadily eroding Internet Explorer's claim of superiority. According to information from NetApplications.com, in October 2004 Internet Explorer had 92 percent of the market; in September 2005 that dropped to 86 percent; and as of September 2006 Internet Explorer's market share dropped to 82 percent, with Firefox's rising to 12.5 percent. In two years Microsoft ceded 10 percent of its audience to its competition.
So how do the latest versions of each browser compare? For this prizefight, we looked at Microsoft Internet Explorer 7, Microsoft's first new Internet browser since 2001, and Mozilla Firefox 2, Mozilla's update of its popular Firefox 1.5 browser released in November 2005.

Round 1: Installation
Here's where we examine the overall process of upgrading or installing the two browsers.

Our individual judges' ratings are based on a 0-to-5-point scale, which results in a final score of 0 to 15 per round.

Player Rafe Peter Elsa Total
Internet Explorer 7
Internet Explorer 7
2

Installing IE 7 requires a reboot and takes forever. Plus the download is giant, and you have to turn off your virus scanner. My installation went smoothly, but I got the feeling IE was reprogramming my computer's DNA as it worked.
1

The IE 7 installer asks users to temporarily disable their antivirus and antispyware protection, which doesn't inspire confidence. Installing IE 7 requires Windows validation, a restart, and a connection to Microsoft servers, which significantly slows down the process.
2

IE 7's installation recommended that we back up important files, close all programs, and eventually restart, while Firefox asked us only to close the old Firefox. And Microsoft checked that we were running a valid copy of Windows XP before we could download IE 7, which felt intrusive (if not insulting) next to the hands-off Firefox installation. But I'm not crazy about IE 7 or Firefox creating browser icons by default for my Windows XP desktop, Start Menu folder, and Quick Launch bar; you'll have to uncheck those during installation if you don't want the shortcuts.
5
Firefox 2
Firefox 2
5

Firefox, on the other hand, is a small download and installs in about 30 seconds, no reboots or gene sequencing required.
4

Installation of Firefox 2 was much faster and easier, completing in a minute or two. It scanned my old version for incompatible extensions, then updated any that were available. Firefox 2 did not include my custom-created search engines, only those defaulted by Mozilla. Any custom engines need to be manually moved into the Searchplugins directory.
4

Firefox was a faster download, plus it migrated every toolbar and all but one of my dozen bookmarklets from Firefox 1 without a hitch.
13

Winner: Firefox 2


Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5
Internet Explorer 7




Firefox 2 x






















Round 2: Look and community
Here's where we look at navigation, as well as overall look and feel. But the online world is rapidly becoming a community. Which browser best embodies the community aspect of the Web?

Player Rafe Peter Elsa Total
Internet Explorer 7
Internet Explorer 7
4

The two browsers both look very good. IE 7 is a bit slicker than Firefox, and it takes more chances with the interface, pushing the standard menu items off to the side. It may take users a few moments to learn where everything is, but it is a thoughtful redesign.
4

Departing from the classic look of version 6 by hiding the menu bar, IE 7 allots more space to the main browser window. The full-screen view is particularly well designed -- tabs and the address bar disappear until you hover over them, creating a true full-screen window. The tabs are clunkier than necessary.
4

Internet Explorer's status as the browser people love to hate is unlikely to change anytime soon. IE 7's drastic redesign is likely to alienate users initially rather than wow them, even though it's now easier to find functions via graphical icons -- once you stop looking for the now-gone drop-down menus of its predecessor. IE 7 thoughtfully offers more customisation than in the past, such as the ability to add more search engines to its search field.
12
Firefox 2
Firefox 2
5

Firefox doesn't have a radical visual refresh, but it does have some new UI features, such as a "word wheel" in the search bar. Firefox destroys IE in the extension and plug-in department. There are hundreds of tools for Firefox to enable all manner of customising. IE has extensions too, but not like Firefox.
5

Hovering over a tab in Firefox 2 now highlights it, and each tab has its own close button, which was previously possible only with add-ons. Most themes aren't yet available for Firefox, but one of my favorites, Littlefox, works OK. Selecting a new theme now prompts Firefox to ask whether you want to restart the browser to see the effects. Customisation for Firefox 2 via add-ons is a major bonus.
5

Firefox's open-source status and myriad add-ons give it a community edge over IE 7.
15

Winner: Firefox 2


Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5
Internet Explorer 7




Firefox 2 x x



Round 3: Tabbed browsing
Tabbed browsing has become a part of the Internet browser world. Microsoft just added it to Internet Explorer 7, but Mozilla has had it in Firefox for years. Which one implements this feature the best?

Player Rafe Peter Elsa Total
Internet Explorer 7
Internet Explorer 7
4

With the latest versions, both browsers treat tabs similarly. You can close tabs with their own little close boxes and open new tab windows by clicking in the tab bar (IE 7 makes it more obvious by displaying a tiny, empty tab). Both highlight the active tab subtly (too subtly for my taste), and let you drag tabs around and save open tabs. Differences: Firefox makes it easy to reload all tabs; IE has a thumbnail viewer.
3

IE 7 includes a New Tab button to the right of your last open tab that takes up unnecessary screen space. I couldn't find a way to remove it. IE 7 bunches two Favorites icons, all open tabs, and the standard browser toolbar in the same row of real estate. A helpful tab preview icon displays thumbnails of all your open tabs for any window.
4

Is it my imagination, or does Firefox open a new tab about a millisescond faster than IE 7 does? At the same time, IE 7's blank tab can help users discover tabbed browsing.
11
Firefox 2
Firefox 2
4

One change in Firefox 2 that is a step backward from the last version: If you open a lot of tabs, Firefox shrinks their size a little and puts arrows at the left and right of the tab bar so that you can scroll back and forth. The previous version shrunk tabs a lot, so you could fit many more into the tab bar. I'm dinging Firefox's score for that one. IE 7 has the same problem.
4

Firefox adds a new Close Tab button to each open tab but didn't add thumbnail previews (a feature that can be added via Firefox extension). It would be nice to incorporate more features from Tab Mix Plus, such as the ability to customise how Ctrl-Tab switches tabs.
5

Firefox's tiny drop-down menu next to its tabs is a convenient shortcut for finding recently viewed pages, and its layout offers more room for tabs -- although once we had a dozen tabs open, we were forced to scroll awkwardly to view the thirteenth tab and beyond. Luckily, though, if Firefox crashes, you can restore those tabs, which IE 7 can't do.
13

Winner: Firefox 2


Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5
Internet Explorer 7




Firefox 2 x x x

Round 4: Cool new features
Microsoft had five years to dream up a new Internet browser; Mozilla's been updating its popular Firefox browser pretty regularly in the last few years. Which offers the coolest new features?

Player Rafe Peter Elsa Total
Internet Explorer 7
Internet Explorer 7
3

There are fancy little flourishes in both browsers (IE has page zoom; Firefox has a spelling checker), but the big news in new browser features right now is RSS reading. Both browsers recognise when a page has an RSS feed, and both will parse XML and display a readable page instead of code when they see it.
3

RSS feeds: Once you've subscribed to a feed via IE 7, it's easy to see, sort, manage, and read your subscriptions from a two-panel interface. Firefox's Live Bookmarks do a similar job, but not as neatly. I only wish IE 7 detected available feeds better.
3

Neither IE 7 nor Firefox do a terrific job of showing off their new features. Many of IE 7's new features are old tricks for Firefox. At least IE 7's RSS icon gave us a hint about its ability to surface newsfeeds; that icon appears within the Firefox address bar only when you land at a Web site with an RSS feed. But once we subscribed to some feeds, we couldn't find them within IE 7. Firefox, on the other hand, displayed them by default on a toolbar and within its Bookmarks folder.
9
Firefox 2
Firefox 2
4

Firefox does a much better job of managing feeds: It will let you subscribe in Firefox's own reader, which awkwardly makes bookmarks of headlines, or in Google, Bloglines, Yahoo, or any reader application you have on your PC. IE will subscribe itself only to feeds, and it doesn't display RSS content as reliably as Firefox.
3

In Firefox 2, I love the Manage Search Engines dialog, but I'd say the Session Saver feature is the biggest improvement. I know that many people who accidentally quit the browser will love it.
4

Firefox's RSS features are even more flexible since (as Rafe mentions) they can let you subscribe with a third-party newsreader. Overall, however, I found the RSS features somewhat clumsy in both browsers and easy for RSS newbies to overlook. IE 7's easy ability to zoom in on a Web page makes for better browsing if you have vision problems. Ctrl-T does the same trick within Firefox, but most users may not memorise such keyboard shortcuts. Firefox also checks your spelling, which could save you from embarrassing yourself in a hasty e-mail or blog post.
11

Winner: Firefox 2


Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5
Internet Explorer 7




Firefox 2 x x x x

Round 5: Security and performance
You can't surf the Web these days without fretting about online villains eager to take your money or your identity. Which browser offers the best?

Player Rafe Peter Elsa Total
Internet Explorer 7
Internet Explorer 7
3

I have to defer to security gurus in this category. Historically I've been impressed with how seamless installing security patches to Firefox has been. As far as privacy, both products now let you quickly erase tracks from your browser, which is good.
4

A phishing filter within IE 7 checks the Web pages you visit using heuristics and a whitelist of legitimate sites. IE 7 lets you clean out your history, temporary files, and Web cookies with one button, but it's not easy to delete specific files in those groups. Another nice browsing-security touch is the "Web page privacy policy" feature. The past history of exploitable security holes in IE is a factor to consider.
3

At least during setup, IE 7 appears to care about security by giving you the choice to install a phishing filter. Firefox doesn't make its security offerings obvious during setup. Both browsers allow you to clear cookie crumbs that show the sites you've seen, but we found such features tricky to find within IE 7's new interface.
10
Firefox 2
Firefox 2
3

Firefox makes it a one-click operation, though, which is much better. On the other hand, it's far too easy to reveal all your stored passwords in Firefox. You can put (another) password in front of this feature, but most people won't, leaving their passwords easily visible to anybody who gets on to their PC.
4

Also adding antiphishing measures, Firefox 2 offers a choice to check sites from a preexisting blacklist or via Google. Firefox 2 also offers more customisation than IE 7, letting you specify which warning messages you'll receive and allowing you to view all your cookies in a list.
5

Firefox's stronger reputation for security and Mozilla's practice of addressing vulnerabilities soon after they're discovered precedes its latest update.
12

Winner: Firefox 2


Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5
Internet Explorer 7




Firefox 2 x x x x

The winner is...

Total points
Internet Explorer 7: 47
Firefox 2: 64


Winner: Firefox 2

Firefox 2 still rules the browser roost for now, despite a much improved version of Internet Explorer. The most obvious new feature for IE 7 (tabs) has been in Firefox forever, and the security additions from Microsoft aren't enough for us to allay concerns over new possible exploits. Lastly, the extensibility of Firefox 2 is its knockout punch, and IE's add-ons cannot compare. The flexibility and customisability of Firefox might be best suited to more advanced Web users, but it has earned its spot at the top of the browsers.

Winner: Firefox 2


Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5
Internet Explorer 7




Firefox 2 x x x x x
Source:www.cnet.com.au
By Robert Vamosi

Microsoft speeds up phishing shield for IE7

Microsoft has quietly released an update for Internet Explorer that fixes a problem with the browser's phishing shield.

The feature that protects against fraudulent Web sites, new in IE7, in some cases could bog down computers running Windows, according to an article on Microsoft's support site published last week. This could happen when a Web page contains many frames or when a user browses many frames in a short time, the company said.

"When you use Windows Internet Explorer 7 to visit a Web page, the computer may respond very slowly as the Phishing Filter evaluates Web page contents," according to Microsoft. "Internet Explorer 7 evaluates the whole Web page when you browse a frame. Therefore, CPU (central processing unit) usage may be very high."

IE7, released in October, is the first major update to Microsoft's ubiquitous Web browser in five years. Security was the number one concern for the update, Microsoft has said. The phishing protection has been a major focus for Microsoft, shielding against malicious Web sites designed to trick users into handing over their personal information.

Mozilla also offers phishing protection in Firefox 2. By default, the Firefox feature works with downloaded blacklists of known phishing sites. IE7, by contrast, checks in with Microsoft to see if a site is known to be untrustworthy.

Microsoft made a fix available last Tuesday, the same day it released 7 security bulletins with patches for 11 vulnerabilities in various products. The phishing fix was not pushed out alongside the security updates but is available on Microsoft's Web site.

Orkut Helper

Orkut Helper




This Will Help You In Orkutting...

Features:
☺ If You Have Not Logged Out While Closing The Browser Window,Still The Next Time You Open Browser & Open http://www.orkut.com, You Are Asked For password :(
With Its Autologin Feature, You Can Login, Without Entering The Password Again.
Also, If You Are Logged In Gmail With "Remember Me On This Computer" Checkbox Checked, You Get Logged Into Orkut Automatically On Opening http://www.orkut.com
It Uses The 'Cookie' Of Gmail/Orkut To Login. Your Password Is Never Checked.

☺ View "My Scrapbook" Link On Each Of Orkut Pages, Not just On Your Profile/Home Pages.

☺ "View Scrapbook" Link In Front Of Profile Link, so that you can go to their scrapbook, without going to their profile.
Similarly,
☺ "View Album" Link In Front Of Profile Link
☺ "View Message" Link In Front Of Profile Link

☺ "View Community Topics" Link In Front Of Community Link
☺ "View Community Events" Link In Front Of Community Link
☺ "View Community Members" Link In Front Of Community Link

☺ Copy Smileys within the scraps/posts so that you can copy Entire scrap/post, including the smileys [:)]
☺ Replace Orkut Smileys With Animated Smileys. Don't you think, the orkut smileys are static images, would you not like some 'animated' smileys.

☺ Replace The Links In Scraps/Posts Which Point To Images By Their Corresponding Images. So that you don't have to click the link to view the images.
Similarly...
☺ Replace Links To SWFs By Their Corresponding SWFs.


& above all, each of these feature can be turned on or off individually.

☺Also You Can Right Click On Any Profile Link To Go To Scrapbook/Album/'Send Message' (& others) pages of any Profile.

☺& You Can Right Click On Any Community Link To Go To Members/Topics/Events (& others) pages of any Community.

Developed By:Ashish Sane

You can download it from here:
Download Orkut Helper